Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation menu
Skip to site footer
Home
Current
Archives
Announcements
About
About the Journal
Aims and Scope
Editorial Team
Editorial workflow
Authors Guidelines
Author Rights
License
Fees (APC)
Editorial Policies
Open Access
Authorship and contributions
Review
Competing Interests
Statement on ethics
Ehitc Use of Artificial Intelligence
Anti-plagiarism
Correction and Retraction
Claims and Complaints
Archiving and Preservation
Metadata Release Protocol
Privacy Policy
Indexing
Statistics
Editorial Management
Visits and Downloads
Reviewers list
Contact
Search
Search
Register
Login
ULL Journals Site
Review
Preliminary Evaluation of the Manuscript
The Editorial Board of the journal will conduct a preliminary analysis of the received manuscript.
If the manuscript is considered suitable for publication, an editor from the Editorial Board will be assigned.
The editor will notify the author that their manuscript is eligible to begin the review process.
Peer Review
If the submission belongs to a section requiring anonymous peer review, the responsible editor will assign two or more reviewers.
The reviewers will follow the criteria established in the
Peer Review Policy
.
Once the blind peer review is completed, the responsible editor will analyze the reviewers’ recommendations and decide:
Accept Submission:
Ready to proceed.
Publishable with Modifications:
Minor changes required.
Resubmit for Review:
Major changes needed.
Not Publishable:
Rejected.
If reviewers provide conflicting recommendations, an additional reviewer will be selected.
e-ISSN
: 2530-8343
ISSN
: 1131-6810 (no longer active)
DOI
:
10.25145/j.fortunat
Make a Submission
Indexed in:
Language
English
Español (España)
Information
For Readers
For Authors
For Librarians