Meaningful learning is the foundation for creativity

Joseph D Novak

Joseph D Novak Cornell Univesity

Palabras clave: education, meaningful learning, creativity, Concept mapping

Resumen

En este trabajo el autor inicialmente presenta las concepciones de Ausubel y sus propias concepciones de aprendizaje significativo, así como los requisitos para este tipo de aprendizaje. Asimismo, la creatividad es vista como una consecuencia de elevados grados de aprendizaje significativo. El pensamiento creativo se contempla como una extensión del aprendizaje significativo. A continuación, el foco queda en la teoría de educación del autor y en el uso de mapas conceptuales como una herramienta para facilitar el aprendizaje significativo, para ayudar en el trabajo de grupos de investigación y en actividades esenciales para el desarrollo profesional de profesores, para captar y almacenar el conocimiento de expertos, utilizando el aplicativo CmapTools y para resolver problemas complejos enfrentados por instituciones privadas y gubernamentales. El mapeamiento conceptual y este aplicativo son propuestos como notablemente facilitadores en la solución creativa de problemas.

Citas

AAAS, (2011). Benchmarks. Google: AAAS Benchmarks.

Acedo, Ma. (2008). Collaborative learning and concept maps: implications for developmental dyslexic learners. Concept Mapping: Connecting Educators Proc. of the Third Int. Conference on Concept Mapping A.J. Cañas, P. Reiska, M. Åhlberg & J.D. Novak, eds.

Ausubel, D.P. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.

—— (1968). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D. and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. Reprinted, 1986, New York: Werbel and Peck.

Ausubel, D.P. (2000). The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge. Dortrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

Bransford, J., Brown, A.L. and Cocking, R.R. (eds.). (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Cañas, A.J., and Novak, J.D. (2008). Concept Mapping using CmapTools to Enhance Meaningful Learning. In A. Osaka, S.B. Shum & T. Sherborne (eds.), Knowledge Cartography: Springer Verlag.

Donaldson, M.C. (1978). Children’s Minds. New York: Norton.

Gelman, S.A., (1999). Dialog on early childhood science, mathematics and technology education: A context for learning. Concept Development in Pre-school Children. (http://www.project2061.org/tools/earlychild/context/gelman.htm).

Getzelz, J.W. and Jackson, P.W. (1962). Creativity and Intelligence; Explorations with Gifted Students. New York: Wiley.

Gardner, H. (1994). Creating Minds. New York: Basic Biiks.

Guilford, J.P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469-479.

Ichijo, K. and Nonaka, I. (eds.) (2007). Knowledge Creation and Management: New challenges for managers. New York, Oxford University Press.

Keil, F.C. (2011). Science Starts Early. Science, 331:1021-1022.

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current developments in Cognitive Science, 9. 178-181.

Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. National Research Council (NRC). (1996) National Science Education Standards. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford University Press.

Novak, J.D. (1977a). A Theory of Education. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

—— (1987). Human constructivism: Toward a unity of psychological and epistemological meaning making. In Joseph D. Novak (ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics Education. Ithaca, NY: Department of Education, Cornell University.

—— (1990). Concept maps and Vee diagrams: Two metacognitive tools for science and mathematics education. Instructional Science, 19, 29-52.

—— (1993). Human constructivism: A unification of psychological and epistemological phenomena in meaning making. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 6, 167-193.

—— (2002). Meaningful learning: the essential factor for conceptual change in limited or appropriate propositional hierarchies (LIPHs) leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4):548-571.

—— (1998). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative tools in Schools and Corporations (2ND ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.

—— (2010). Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative tools in Schools and Corporations. New York: Taylor-Francis. Novak, J.D. and Gowin, D.B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Novak, J.D. and Musonda, D. (1991). A twelve-year longitudinal study of science concept learning. American Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 117-153.

Palmer, C. (1996). In Vitro and In Vitro Effects of Bicarbonate on Botrytis cenerea. Unpublished PhD thesis, Ithaca, New York: Cornell University.

Piaget, J. (1926). The Language and Thought of the Child. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Roberts, V. and Joiner, R. (2007). Investigating the efficacy of concept mapping with pupils with autistic spectrum disorder. British Journal of Special Education, 34, Issue 3, 127-135, September.

Torrence, E.P.. (1962) Guiding Creative Talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Schneps, M. (1989). Private Universe Project. Cambridge, MA: Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Sternberg, R.J. (1988). The Nature of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.